Google readies automated tool for those wanting to disappear from search results
The online tool will have a mechanism to prevent unauthorized takedowns, said a German DPA with knowledge of the matter.
By Loek Essers
CIO.com
Showing posts with label Google censorship. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Google censorship. Show all posts
Friday, June 20, 2014
Google readies automated tool for those wanting to disappear from search results
May 16, 2014
IDG News Service —
People will be able to use an online tool to ask Google
not to display search results about them, according to a German data
protection commissioner.
Google will create the tool following a decision by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), which ruled on Tuesday that Google and other search engines can be ordered to delete links to outdated information about a person published on the Internet.
European citizens that want to be forgotten by search engines can file a request directly with the search engine operator to have out-of-date information about them deleted. The operator must determine if the information displayed about the person in its search results is still relevant, and if not, must remove it from the results, the court ruled.
In order to deal with these requests Google plans to release an online tool to implement a procedure for a right to be forgotten, or rather for the right not to be found, said Johannes Caspar, Hamburg's Commissioner for Data Protection. The system will include an authentication mechanism to prevent unauthorized takedown requests, he added.
Google already offers semi-automated tools for requesting that limited categories of personal information such as signatures, national identification numbers, or bank account details be removed from its search results, but those will need to be expanded.
"The ruling has significant implications for how we handle takedown requests," a Google spokesman said in an email, declining to comment on how the system would work exactly.
"This is logistically complicated -- not least because of the many languages involved and the need for careful review. As soon as we have thought through exactly how this will work, which may take several weeks, we will let our users know," he said. He could not say if the amount of takedown requests has increased since the ruling.
Caspar called for data protection authorities (DPAs) in Europe to consider harmonizing their criteria for the deletion of a link in a search engine. "In the interest of an equal treatment of all European citizens, especially the search engine providers, there should be coherent principles amongst all DPAs in Europe," he added.
France's DPA, the National Commission on Computing and Liberty (CNIL), said Friday that the court ruling confirms its existing interpretation of French law, and that it stands ready to enforce the ruling in France if Google does not respond satisfactorily to requests.
Meanwhile other European DPAs including the Irish Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (DPC), the U.K.'s Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) and the Norwegian Data Protection Authority are still reviewing the verdict and its possible implications...
Google will create the tool following a decision by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), which ruled on Tuesday that Google and other search engines can be ordered to delete links to outdated information about a person published on the Internet.
European citizens that want to be forgotten by search engines can file a request directly with the search engine operator to have out-of-date information about them deleted. The operator must determine if the information displayed about the person in its search results is still relevant, and if not, must remove it from the results, the court ruled.
In order to deal with these requests Google plans to release an online tool to implement a procedure for a right to be forgotten, or rather for the right not to be found, said Johannes Caspar, Hamburg's Commissioner for Data Protection. The system will include an authentication mechanism to prevent unauthorized takedown requests, he added.
Google already offers semi-automated tools for requesting that limited categories of personal information such as signatures, national identification numbers, or bank account details be removed from its search results, but those will need to be expanded.
"The ruling has significant implications for how we handle takedown requests," a Google spokesman said in an email, declining to comment on how the system would work exactly.
"This is logistically complicated -- not least because of the many languages involved and the need for careful review. As soon as we have thought through exactly how this will work, which may take several weeks, we will let our users know," he said. He could not say if the amount of takedown requests has increased since the ruling.
Caspar called for data protection authorities (DPAs) in Europe to consider harmonizing their criteria for the deletion of a link in a search engine. "In the interest of an equal treatment of all European citizens, especially the search engine providers, there should be coherent principles amongst all DPAs in Europe," he added.
France's DPA, the National Commission on Computing and Liberty (CNIL), said Friday that the court ruling confirms its existing interpretation of French law, and that it stands ready to enforce the ruling in France if Google does not respond satisfactorily to requests.
Meanwhile other European DPAs including the Irish Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (DPC), the U.K.'s Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) and the Norwegian Data Protection Authority are still reviewing the verdict and its possible implications...
Wednesday, May 07, 2014
San Diego Union-Tribune gets shinoffed
Dan Shinoff
I didn't think this sort of thing could happen to the San Diego Union-Tribune, the major newspaper in San Diego County. I thought it only happened to small-time bloggers like me.
A few years ago Stutz Artiano Shinoff & Holtz used its influence to get Google to shut down my San Diego Education Report Blog. It also managed to sabotage my blog in Google search results. I had to send legal documents like this one to Google lawyers to get them to reinstate my blog. And I never managed to stop Google Alerts from hiding my blog and mentions of me in other media outlets.
Still, I never imagined that Stutz law firm could get Google Alerts to conceal mentions of Dan Shinoff in the San Diego Union-Tribune.
But that's exactly what Google did. I wouldn't have known about the most recent stories about Dan Shinoff in the UT if I didn't also use Talkwalker alerts.
My "shinoff" alert on Google seemed to die on the vine. It didn't alert me to recent stories by the UT, including this story about Dan Shinoff about public records.
This is all the more bizarre since the "shinoff" alert used to tell me every time Dan Shinoff's nephew wrote a sports story for his college newspaper.
If you want to be alerted to stories about Dan Shinoff, I recommend Talkwalker's free alerts. Google Alerts' staff is strangely negligent when it comes to certain search terms. For example, you won't get Google alerts for my name (Maura Larkins). They'll tell you about every other person on the planet named Maura, but none of the alerts will be about me.
Emily Alpert now works for the Los Angeles Times
Emily Alpert wrote about Dan Shinoff and the San Diego County Office of Education before she was muzzled and then unceremoniously dismissed in 2011 by Voice of San Diego.
See all posts on Google censorship.
This can't be good news for U-T San Diego. Voice of San Diego noted on May 5, 2014:
"UT San Diego’s circulation levels have fallen sharply since last year, the Reader reports. Comparing the six months ending on March 31, the average circulation of the Sunday edition fell from 425,000 to 362,166."
My blog hits are often as low as 300 a day. How can Google do this to a newspaper with over 300,000 readers in one day?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)