Daniel Shinoff and MiraCosta College trustees just don't get it.
Attorney Daniel Shinoff boasts that he's an expert in the Brown Act. (The Brown Act says public entity boards must keep all meetings open except in specific circumstances.)
But Shinoff apparently hasn't been urging his clients at MiraCosta College to obey the Brown Act.
Here's the point, Dan: The issues in the MiraCosta debate are serious public issues, not a private matter between trustees.
You and Richart and the majority trustees have threatened the minority trustees because they discussed Richart with the media. But you and the majority trustees don't seem to want to discuss ANYTHING in public.
Thank goodness that Lola Sherman of the San Diego Union Tribune was present at a recent meeting to represent the public's right to hear the debate. How else will the public know whom to vote for if they don't know what the board members say and think?
Sure, there might be some personality clashes as a result of the $3 million investigation you and Victoria Richart masterminded, but this is not some sort of couples counseling. These are public officials making decisions, and the majority seems to have made some very bad decisions.
< Minority bloc MiraCosta College Trustee Jacqueline Simon
I think the majority board members simply want to threaten the minority in private, out of earshot of the public.
Stay strong, Gloria, Judy and Jacqueline! Elections are coming, and help is on the way.
Saturday, April 19, 2008
Lola Sherman keeps them honest
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment